NIST Handbook 150: Calibration Labels
Official context for equipment identification, dates and use of the NVLAP symbol.
View detailsResource Guide
A status sticker should help a user find the right instrument record. It should not pretend to be the calibration certificate or make an unsupported accreditation claim.
Published 2026-09-28
Digital proof before production. Material and adhesive options are discussed according to your application requirements.

Choose the visible fields from your quality procedure: equipment ID, calibration date, due date or due criterion, current status and a record reference when space allows. The controlled record holds the actual results, limits, method and approvals. NIST material discussing calibration labeling identifies equipment ID, calibration date and cross-reference to the certificate in its NVLAP context; it also warns that an accreditation symbol must not imply approval of the equipment. Do not put such a symbol on a generic mockup or label without authorization.
Imagine two similar pressure gauges beside one test rig. The technician has a service binder but only one gauge has a readable asset ID. The due month alone cannot tell which record belongs to which instrument. This is an illustrative scene, not a claim about a customer. A stable asset ID on the body, plus a status label that points to the controlled record, makes the handoff less ambiguous. If a gauge is out of service, use the site procedure to indicate that status rather than leaving an old valid-looking sticker in place.
The asset ID usually stays with the instrument; the status and due information change. That suggests a durable ID label plus a replaceable status label in some workflows. Other organizations use a single controlled label. The buyer should decide the update method, who may print it, and whether each reprint requires a recorded approval. A printer can reproduce approved fields and numbering rules but cannot assign an equipment calibration interval or declare an instrument fit for use.
A sticker on a curved gauge case, oily housing or frequently cleaned instrument needs a different placement review from one on a flat panel. Avoid the dial, controls, seal, ventilation and existing safety markings. Test the finished-size text under the actual lighting. If the surface is too small, use a short ID with a record lookup rather than squeezing the entire history into unreadable print. Ask for material and print durability information for the specific cleaning and handling conditions.
Provide the asset list format, sample text, minimum case area, surface photos, color coding rule, update frequency and whether labels are printed in-house or supplied preprinted. Confirm if the label needs variable fields or a write-on area. Proof one real-size sample on each instrument shape, then review legibility and removal without obscuring the equipment marking. The label artwork is an interface to a quality process, not evidence that calibration was performed.
FAQ
No. Verify the current controlled calibration record and the organization authorized status decision.
Not without the specific authorization and scope required by the relevant accreditation body. Do not infer accreditation from sample artwork.